All posts by Hotsearch

微运动,长寿新解码:当“动一动”成了不运动者的健康护符

在现代社会,“缺乏运动”常被视为健康头号杀手之一。然而,一项最新发表于《循还》(Circulation)期刊的研究正在悄悄重写这项叙述。研究者指出,即使不进行传统意义上的运动,只要每天在生活中“动一动”,哪怕只是打扫、爬楼梯或追赶公车,也能显著降低心血管疾病风险,延长寿命。

对于那些不爱健身房、不跑步,也不做瑜伽的人来说,这或许是一则福音。

从吸尘器到公车站:微小动作,大幅回报

本次研究由澳大利亚雪梨大学(University of Sydney)公共卫生学院教授伊曼纽尔·史塔玛塔奇斯(Emmanuel Stamatakis)领导,团队分析了英国生物银行(UK Biobank)超过2万名成年人的行为数据,追踪他们为期七天的生活动线。与过去许多依赖问卷调查的研究不同,这项研究采用高精准度的活动追踪器,为参与者绘制出日常动作的“行为地图”。

“我们发现,那些经常进行短时间、高频率活动的人——哪怕这些活动看起来毫不起眼——其心血管健康状况显著优于一整天久坐的人。”史塔玛塔奇斯在接受《环球邮报》采访时表示。

例如,有人每天只花三分钟快速吸尘、两分钟快步追赶公交车,或是中午爬几层楼取餐,这些加总起来的“动态积累”,竟然足以显著降低未来罹患心脏病或中风的风险。

健康新范式:“微运动”的革命

“我们或许要重新定义‘运动’这个概念。” 史塔玛塔奇斯说。他指出,现代健康建议往往强调有氧运动、阻力训练等结构化活动,但这类运动对大多数人而言并不容易实现。

“现实是,许多人白天时间被工作、家庭责任占据,他们不是不想运动,而是无法找到‘空档’。”这正是“微运动”理念的切入点。

研究显示,那些完全没有结构性锻炼,却在生活中不断移动的受试者,比起久坐族,其健康风险显著下降。这包括家务劳动、园艺、走去倒垃圾,甚至是频繁上下楼取快递。

事实上,研究团队甚至提出了一个新术语:“生活型高强度间歇运动”(VILPA, Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity),意即在日常生活中偶发但剧烈的短暂运动行为。

“就像你跑去赶车,几秒钟,但心跳飙升、肌肉快速收缩,这种‘迷你爆发’对心血管极有益。”史塔玛塔奇斯解释。

科技时代的反讽:我们为何变得“太静止”?

令人玩味的是,科技的进步本意在于提升生活质量,却也悄悄偷走了我们身体的动能。

自动电梯取代了楼梯、送餐平台让人足不出户、办公室“远程”化甚至让人整天不离沙发。而这正是近年来“久坐病”(sitting disease)一词不断被提出的背景。

加拿大卫生局在2024年最新指南中指出,成人每天应避免连续久坐超过30分钟,并建议至少进行150分钟的中等强度运动。然而,仅有不到四成成年人能达标。

“问题不在于人们懒惰,而是我们的生活方式系统性地剥夺了动的机会。”多伦多大学行为健康研究员温妮·林博士评论道。“这项新研究提出的启发在于——我们或许不需要‘拨出时间运动’,而是需要‘重新设计我们的生活流程’,让运动‘顺便发生’。”

用生活打败疾病:加拿大可以怎么做?

从政策角度来看,“微运动”理念也给城市设计、工作环境、公共健康倡议提供了新灵感。

温哥华部分企业已经引入“站立会议”“步行午餐”等微创新,鼓励员工在不离开工作的前提下,增加身体活动。同时,加拿大多地开始增设“慢跑友好楼梯间”、在公车站增设“动一动”提示标志,营造“轻动文化”。

“这不是一句口号,而是政策导向。”卑诗省健康厅在其2025年健康蓝图中写道。

写在最后:健康,不一定要汗流浃背

这项研究的价值,在于它提供了健康的新路径,尤其是对那些不热衷于传统运动的人。

正如一位研究参与者在反馈中写道:“我过去总觉得,只有‘动很多’才算努力。现在我明白了,‘动一点’也很重要。”

回到最根本的问题:我们是否注定要为了健康而受苦?或许答案正在改变。

或许,通往长寿与健康的钥匙,不是痛苦的健身课程,而是每日生活中,一个小动作、一次站起、一个快步走的决定。

——“动一点,也能活得好很多。”

#加拿大家园论坛

冲浪、阳光与争议:伊万卡的“阔太太日常”如何反射美国阶级裂痕?

在哥斯达黎加的阳光下,伊万卡·川普骑着冲浪板,在海浪中练习平衡的画面,或许本意是展现活力与自律,但在社交网络上,这一幕却再次点燃了争议。曾经的“白宫第一千金”,如今的迈阿密名媛,伊万卡正在经历从政治影子到精致生活的角色过渡,然而这场“生活方式转型”却并不轻松——因为在今天的美国,她所代表的不仅是一个家庭的荣耀,而是一个阶层的特权。

据4月17日美媒报道,现年43岁的伊万卡被拍到在哥斯达黎加圣特雷莎海滩上参加冲浪课程。身穿黑白长袖冲浪衣的她,看上去既投入又享受。目击者称她在沙滩上练习基本动作后,便下水体验实战,动作娴熟但仍显青涩,教练始终在旁陪伴。

这不是伊万卡第一次展现“精致生活”。自从拜登政府上台后,这位前白宫高级顾问就逐渐淡出政坛,搬至佛罗里达州的迈阿密海景豪宅,过起了“阔太太”般的生活。冲浪、滑雪、高端瑜伽、跨国旅行与品牌代言——她的社交媒体宛如一部精心策划的上流生活指南。

但问题在于:这份优雅生活,本身就是一种公共叙事

精致与脱节:冲浪中的阶级隐喻

在一个深受经济焦虑困扰的时代,美国民众越来越难以接受“生活特权”的炫耀,即便表面上包装得再低调。数据显示,目前美国1%的最富群体控制了全国近40%的财富,而数百万中产与低收入家庭正在与通胀、医疗账单和住房成本作斗争。

伊万卡在圣特雷莎冲浪的消息被曝光后,社交平台上迅速炸开锅。有人调侃她是“共和党版的戈普温·帕特洛”,有人则更尖锐地指出:“她告诉年轻女性要自立,却在用信托基金上瑜伽课。”

评论家凯瑟琳·琼斯在《大西洋月刊》指出:“伊万卡生活的每一处细节——从冲浪教练到海景别墅——都是结构性特权的象征。她可以选择退出政治,但无法退出公众眼中的阶级代表角色。”

“赋权女性”还是“精英虚伪”?

在白宫任职期间,伊万卡多次提出“赋权女性”的政策倡议,倡导职业女性获得平等机会。然而如今,她所展示的“理想女性形象”越来越脱离现实女性的生存环境。

她穿的衣服、上的课、去的度假地、使用的育儿资源,都不是一般职业女性能够承受的消费。相比平凡母亲在职场与育儿之间挣扎的真实景况,伊万卡的形象更多是一种“精致幻影”。

一位芝加哥大学社会学者在接受《环球邮报》采访时指出:“伊万卡的问题不在于她富有,而在于她在向大众传递一个信号:你若不成功,是因为你不够努力。而她忘了,成功的起点对她来说,是许多人一生都达不到的位置。”

政治的隐形回声:伊万卡“退出”了吗?

虽然伊万卡与丈夫贾里德·库什纳已不再为其父川普政府效力,但据《纽约时报》消息,两人至今仍在政治上发挥“顾问式影响力”。有人士透露,他们参与了川普阵营的非正式筹资活动,并就选战策略提出建议。

这让她的“生活方式展示”不再是私人选择,而成为一种有意或无意的政治延伸。

“她既不愿面对公众政治的压力,又不肯放弃家族政治的红利。”美国政治分析师马修·福尔曼指出,“这正是现代政客家属的矛盾:既想自由生活,又不愿完全隐退。”

在此背景下,每一次伊万卡的公开露面、每一次社交媒体的更新,都会被解读为川普家族对公众影响力的延续策略。

镜头外的反思:特权生活的社会效应

伊万卡并非唯一被“特权批评”缠身的政治家属。肯尼迪家族、布什家族乃至拜登的子女,也曾因特权生活方式引发争议。但在川普时代,特权与民粹的对撞显得尤为剧烈——毕竟,川普曾号称“为被遗忘的美国人而战”。

而伊万卡的冲浪照,则在无声中强化了人们对“精英脱节”的感知。她身穿定制泳装,脚踩冲浪板,在碧蓝海岸练习微笑与平衡;而另一边,美国中西部的家庭正在因为医疗欠费选择关闭家庭小企业,母亲们在学校门口等待打两份工的丈夫。

这是两个国家的生活,却在同一张报纸里共存。

写在最后:不仅是伊万卡

从冲浪板上的身影到媒体页面上的争议,伊万卡的生活轨迹再度提醒我们,在这个阶层断裂越来越深的时代,个体的选择不再只是私人行为,而成为社会结构的镜面。

她的生活方式,也许本身无可指摘,但她所承担的,是一种“象征性责任”——即使她自己不愿承认。奢华与自由不再只是特权的代名词,更成为一场关于美国未来走向的政治缩影。

这一次,伊万卡没有说话。但冲浪的画面,本身就已经是一次强有力的“非语言表态”。而美国,也终将从这样的镜头中,重新反思权力、特权与平等的真正含义。

#加拿大家园论坛

马伊琍角色造型变胖了,她的新作入围戛纳

来源:影视口碑榜

有一位上海的网友,在个人社交平台上分享了一组偶遇马伊琍正在街头拍摄作品的画面。

据悉,马伊琍这一次拍摄的新作品《清水落大雨》,是一部文艺片。虽然刚刚开始拍摄,但是很期待她出演的作品开播。

从该网友曝光的画面中看,马伊琍穿着浅蓝色T恤下搭配牛仔裙,肩上挎着一个帆布包包。看上去马伊琍要比以前胖了,不知道是否是角度问题,还是导演要求这个角色需要胖一点呢?她依旧是留着一头利落的短发,因为马伊琍更适合短发,所以她的形象一直没有变化。

马伊琍这样的穿搭显年轻活力,有网友直言:

年龄上去了,衣品却毫无长进。

也有网友表示:

她似乎胖了一些,衣品也显得有些“土气”。

虽然对马伊琍的衣品充满着吐槽,但是对她言而还是有好处的,起码有人愿意关注。

有网友觉得马伊琍不适合这样穿搭。

有网友则表示:

她没有变胖,挺好的!

娱乐圈明星大部分出行都是化着精致的浓妆艳抹,马伊琍却是,短发,素颜,穿搭简单,主打一个我怎么舒适怎么来。在她心目中,讨好别人,还不如讨好自己。

马伊琍的这个造型与17年前出演《奋斗》中的夏琳一角十分相似,充满着青春气息。有网友感慨:

马伊琍的每一次出现,都是一场关于岁月与风格的对话。

公开资料显示,马伊琍出生于1976年,毕业于上海戏剧学院。1996年凭电视剧《真空爱情记录》正式出道,之后出演《还珠格格第三部天上人间》、《江北好人》等。

最让观众印象深刻的是,马伊琍出演《我的前半生》罗子君一角,并获得第24届上海电视节白玉兰奖最佳女主角。2024年出演《繁花》《龙城》获第二届中国电视剧年度盛典年度女演员奖。

眨眼间,马伊琍出道近30年了,她出演了多个不同类型的作品与角色。虽然不能每一次都能够为观众带来惊喜,但是马伊琍的演技不断进步。最难得的是,她敢于去挑战年轻的角色。

该网友晒出的画面中看,当天太阳很充足。有3位助理跟在马伊琍后面,有一位专门为她打伞遮阳。

马伊琍却主动接过伞,自己撑着。可见,她没有架子,与助理们相处显得很有亲和力。展现出马伊琍的为人素养,不会因为自己是大明星,所以高高在上的姿态。

在网络上流传《清水落大雨》男一号是王阳,如果是真得也不意外。近些年,王阳人脉,资源特别好

。虽然出演的作品不是每一部都是精品,但是他将角色的特点塑造的很饱满,很有灵气。

能够达到这种效果都是人生的阅历与自己的努力钻研换来的,因此,他赢得无数观众的喜欢。王阳的名气增大后,也有自己的忠实粉丝,这几年出演的作品也多了。

说回马伊琍,既是一个单亲妈妈又是一个大明星,不缺人脉,不缺资源。虽然马伊琍平时还要兼顾两个女儿成长点滴,

但是她对待剧本绝不敷衍了事,保持作品稳定的输品,并能够将角色塑造得出色。

马伊琍不仅有过硬的演技,有出圈的角色,而且有奖项傍身。年轻时凭自己的实力在娱乐圈赢得一席之地,显然,她的基本盘很平稳。马伊琍比较少参加综艺节目,又能够维系自己的曝光度与知名度。

据媒体报道,周璟豪导演,张子枫、马伊琍主演的《花漾少女杀人事件》入围戛纳电影节平行单元

“导演双周”。

这个消息最开心的无疑是马伊琍的粉丝,也是她多年的付出得到了回报。希望在接下来的日子,马伊琍能够出演更多作品与观众见面

经济风暴预警:3月裁员潮席卷加拿大,安省50万人或陷失业危机

随着全球市场持续动荡、美国贸易战硝烟再起,加拿大经济正处于新一轮寒冬的边缘。3月份全国裁员高达3.3万个岗位,而仅安大略省就有高达50万人面临失业风险。道明银行前首席经济学家唐·德拉蒙德(Don Drummond)发出警告:一场前所未有的就业风暴正悄然袭来。

裁员数据触目惊心:3.3万岗位消失,安省或成“震中”

加拿大统计局数据显示,2025年3月,全国净减少33,000个就业岗位,创下疫情后最大单月跌幅。而此前2月就业数据已呈现停滞迹象,进一步印证经济动能正在快速放缓。

“这不仅仅是一组冰冷的数据,它是经济衰退即将来临的警钟,”唐·德拉蒙德在接受CTV News专访时表示。他指出,尤其是制造业与汽车产业的岗位损失最为严重,而这正是安大略省的经济命脉。“如果这轮衰退持续,仅安省就有可能失去多达50万个工作机会。”

多重冲击:全球放缓+贸易战升温,加拿大首当其冲

除了国内投资趋冷、利率高企压制消费外,加拿大还正承受外部重压——尤其是来自美国的贸易战升级。4月初,美国前总统特朗普重返政坛后迅速宣布,对所有进口汽车加征25%关税,对未纳入CUSMA协定的进口商品加征10%通用关税,震动全球。

“我们正处于一场地缘经济浩劫的中心。”德拉蒙德警告道。他指出,美国的关税不仅打击加国制造业,也间接波及亚太国家,“越南、澳大利亚等地尽管与美方无巨大贸易失衡,但也不得不应对高额关税带来的全球连锁反应。”

重创实业:Stellantis工厂停产,数千工人“被迫休假”

关税带来的连锁反应迅速显现。本周,Stellantis宣布旗下温莎装配厂自周一起停产两周,数千名工人陷入失业焦虑。而此前该公司位于布兰普顿的电动SUV生产线也被“重新评估”而暂停。

“我们不是在等待风暴,我们已经身处风暴中心。”一名不愿透露姓名的车间主管表示,“现在连招工广告都撤下来了,大家都在担心‘裁员通知’什么时候发来。”

政府对策:福特省长喊话“自救”,宣布百亿经济纾困计划

面对经济寒流来袭,安大略省政府迅速推出110亿加元援助计划——包括推迟征收管理税、通过WSIB发放总额超40亿的安全雇主退税、以及对十项企业相关税目实施减免政策。

“我们无法控制特朗普总统的决定,但我们可以决定安省的未来。”省长道格·福特在安省奥里利亚一次记者会上表示。他还特别提及将“全力保护汽车工人”,并承诺破除内部贸易壁垒,加速贸易多元化,增强省内经济韧性。

联邦政府出手反击:加拿大也对美汽车“动刀”

与此同时,总理马克·卡尼宣布对所有不符合CUSMA标准的美国产汽车征收同等关税,并严控非加国产零部件流入国内生产线。“这不是一场我们主动挑起的战斗,但我们不会手软。”

卡尼直言,特朗普政府的贸易政策“既不合理、也不符合美国利益”,并警告全球已因美国保护主义而步入通胀与增长放缓的“恶性循环”。

背后博弈:政治动机?2025大选前的危机导火索

值得注意的是,这轮经济风暴爆发的时间点——恰逢美国2025年大选年。一些分析人士认为,特朗普重新启动关税机制,意图通过“外部威胁”重塑铁锈带支持基础。而加拿大,作为近邻与主要出口国,成了“最理想的靶子”。

“这是一场政治经济混战,加拿大必须跳脱对美依赖的单一结构。”多伦多大学经济学教授琳达·赵表示。她建议加拿大应加快与东盟、南美等新兴市场的自贸谈判,“唯有跳出美式规则陷阱,才能真正恢复独立自主的经济航道。”

结语:风暴虽远未结束,但加拿大有机会重塑自己

加拿大正在经受一场罕见的经济冲击——这不仅仅是就业市场的“阵痛”,更是一场全球经济再平衡中的博弈与重塑。但危机,也孕育着转型的契机。

“如果我们能趁这场风暴推进绿色产业链重构、多元化贸易网络建设、以及劳动技能提升计划,或许十年后的加拿大会更加强大。”德拉蒙德如是说。

危机当前,保持清醒,比恐慌更重要。

#加拿大家园论坛

Economic Storm Alert: March Layoffs Sweep Across Canada as 500,000 Jobs in Ontario Hang by a Thread

Amid ongoing global market turmoil and a resurgent U.S. trade war, the Canadian economy is teetering on the edge of a new recession. With a staggering 33,000 jobs lost nationwide in March alone—and up to 500,000 workers in Ontario potentially at risk—former TD Bank Chief Economist Don Drummond has sounded the alarm: an unprecedented employment storm may be underway.

Shocking Numbers: 33,000 Jobs Lost in March, Ontario at the Epicenter

According to Statistics Canada, the country shed 33,000 jobs in March 2025—the largest monthly drop since the pandemic. February had already shown signs of stagnation, with no significant employment growth. The message is clear: economic momentum is stalling.

“This isn’t just about cold statistics—it’s a warning signal that a recession is approaching,” said Drummond in an interview with CTV News. He pointed out that the manufacturing and auto sectors were the hardest hit—sectors central to Ontario’s economy. “If this downturn continues, Ontario alone could see half a million jobs disappear.”

Multiple Shocks: Global Slowdown + Trade War Escalation = Canada Under Pressure

Canada is being squeezed from all sides—not just by domestic high interest rates and weak investment, but by mounting external pressure, especially from its largest trading partner: the United States.

In early April, former U.S. President Donald Trump returned to the political scene with a bang, announcing a 25% tariff on all imported vehicles and a 10% general tariff on non-CUSMA imports.

“We are at the epicenter of a geoeconomic earthquake,” said Drummond. He emphasized that even countries like Vietnam and Australia—which don’t have large trade imbalances with the U.S.—are now suffering the ripple effects of aggressive American tariffs.

Auto Sector Takes a Hit: Stellantis Plant Shuts Down, Thousands Left in Limbo

The consequences have been immediate. Stellantis, a major auto manufacturer, announced it will halt operations at its Windsor Assembly Plant for two weeks, leaving thousands of workers in employment limbo. Earlier, the company also paused its next-generation electric Jeep Compass production line in Brampton to “reevaluate its product strategy.”

“We’re not waiting for the storm to hit—we’re already in it,” said a shop floor supervisor who requested anonymity. “Even the job postings have been pulled. Everyone’s worried the next announcement will be layoffs.”

Ontario’s Response: Premier Ford Announces $11B Emergency Relief Package

In response to the unfolding crisis, the Ontario government has launched an $11 billion relief plan to cushion the blow. The measures include a six-month deferral on certain administrative taxes, and an expanded rebate through the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB)—doubling the previous $2 billion rebate issued in March.

“We can’t control President Trump, but we can control the future we want to build for Ontario,” said Premier Doug Ford during a visit to Orillia. He emphasized his administration’s commitment to protecting auto workers and pledged to break down interprovincial trade barriers, diversify exports, and build a more resilient economy.

The province also announced tax relief measures across ten categories, including the Employer Health Tax, Gasoline and Fuel Taxes, Tobacco Tax, and Horse Racing Levy.

Federal Government Hits Back: Canada Slaps Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Cars

The federal government is not standing idly by. Prime Minister Mark Carney announced retaliatory tariffs on all American-made vehicles that do not meet CUSMA standards. Even vehicles that technically qualify under the agreement will be taxed if they contain any non-Canadian components.

“These tariffs are unjustified, unfounded, and flat-out wrong,” said Carney, warning that Trump’s protectionist trade crusade could “destabilize” the global economy. He criticized the U.S. for adopting a confrontational approach that he said is driving up inflation and choking global growth.

The Political Underpinning: Is This a Campaign Playbook for 2025?

The timing of this economic storm is no coincidence—it comes just as the U.S. enters its 2025 election cycle. Some analysts believe Trump’s renewed tariffs are part of a strategy to shore up support in the Rust Belt by portraying foreign competition—particularly from Canada—as a threat to American jobs.

“This is a geopolitical and economic chess game. Canada must escape its overreliance on the U.S.,” said Professor Linda Zhao, an economist at the University of Toronto. She urged Canada to accelerate trade deals with ASEAN, South America, and other emerging markets. “Only by stepping out of the U.S.-centric trade framework can Canada reclaim true economic sovereignty.”

Conclusion: The Storm Isn’t Over, But It Could Be an Opportunity for Reinvention

Canada is facing a rare economic shock—one that goes beyond temporary layoffs and hints at a fundamental shift in global trade dynamics. Yet within every crisis lies the seed of reinvention.

“If we use this moment to pivot toward green supply chains, trade diversification, and workforce upskilling, Canada could emerge stronger a decade from now,” said Drummond.

The storm may be raging, but panic isn’t the answer. Clarity, resilience, and foresight will decide who we become when the clouds finally lift.

#加拿大家园论坛

在加拿大,手机出现这种现象,你可能正被监听!

当你的手机莫名发烫、突然被锁,或电量异常消耗时,这可能并非技术故障那么简单。在加拿大,这类“日常小故障”或许隐藏着一个更惊人的真相:你,可能正被监听。

一场围绕“国家安全”、间谍软件与个人隐私的较量,正在你看不见的手机后台悄然上演。

警察也中招?“安全卫士”也未能幸免

2023年8月,退役温哥华警官保罗·麦克纳马拉(Paul McNamara)前往蒙特利尔度假期间,与安省一名现役皇家骑警皮特·梅里菲尔德(Pete Merrifield)通话。就在通话过程中,他发现手机异常发热,“像拿着一块正在融化的铁板”。随后,尝试打开Uber应用叫车时,却发现手机已被系统锁定,原因竟是“密码尝试次数过多”。

当时他还以为这不过是智能系统的“抽风”,但数月后,一份加拿大皇家骑警(RCMP)内部法庭文件揭露:McNamara和Merrifield的手机被植入了一款名为ODIT(On-device Investigation Tool)的秘密间谍程序,能够绕过用户权限,悄无声息地获取短信、语音、加密聊天记录,甚至远程控制麦克风与摄像头。

被监听的理由?一个朋友的“外国干涉”案

监听事件源于两人共同的好友——前皇家骑警督察威廉·马哲(William Majcher)。Majcher因涉嫌“替外国势力从事干涉活动”在2023年被指控,案件目前仍在审理之中。

但McNamara与Merrifield并非嫌疑人,仅是案件证人。他们在法庭上称自己“与Majcher没有任何非法关系”,并认为RCMP之所以监听他们,是因为Majcher身在香港,技术上难以植入ODIT,于是警方“另辟蹊径”,转而监控他身边的老同事,以此捕捉间接证据。

皇家骑警一份2023年5月的机密文件证实了这一点:监听的目的,是为了“收集与Majcher有关的历史信息和书面证据”。

谁来监管这些“合法间谍”?

更令人不安的是,加拿大目前并无明确法律框架监管ODIT一类的设备端间谍软件。皇家骑警承认,自2017年起便已秘密部署该技术,且未主动告知隐私专员或公众,直至案件曝光。

网络安全专家指出,ODIT的能力远超传统监听手段,甚至可绕过设备关机状态,持续采集数据。而这一“合法间谍”工具的使用标准、授权流程、数据保存方式,迄今仍是信息黑箱。

“这已经不是技术问题,而是立法缺失。”加拿大网络政策顾问Marie Côté表示,“我们赋予执法机构侦查工具的同时,也必须明确其边界。”

“连我都不安全,那普通人呢?”

McNamara和Merrifield已向联邦政府提起诉讼,索赔550万加元,并指控RCMP与加拿大安全情报局(CSIS)散布虚假信息,导致他们失去安全许可,甚至影响职业生涯。

“如果我们这些曾在系统里的人都可能被监听,那普通公民的隐私还有什么保障?”McNamara在接受CBC采访时质问。

法庭文件还揭示,警方在调查过程中还“误入”了数个无关电话号码,造成密码破解失败等异常现象。而这些“无辜号码”的拥有者至今身份未明,也未收到任何法律通知。

你的手机,是否也中招了?

以下是可能遭到ODIT或类似间谍软件入侵的五个警示信号:

  1. 异常发热:手机在待机或使用轻量应用时突然烫手。
  2. 电量快速下降:充满电不到半天即告耗尽。
  3. 账号异常提示:频繁收到“密码尝试错误”或未知设备登录通知。
  4. 运行卡顿/流量飙升:可能是后台偷偷上传数据。
  5. 摄像头/麦克风莫名启用:未使用视频应用时指示灯亮起,或突然弹出权限请求。

当然,这些现象也可能是硬件问题或普通病毒感染,但若持续出现多个信号,建议提高警惕。

数字时代,如何守住隐私底线?

在“人人一机在手”的时代,我们无法完全摆脱数字风险,但可以从以下几步提升防护力:

  • 开启双重验证(2FA):即使密码泄露,仍需短信或APP验证码才可登录账户。
  • 限制敏感权限:定期检查麦克风、摄像头、通讯录等授权,关闭不必要访问。
  • 勿点击不明链接:尤其是社交软件或短信中陌生号码发来的网页。
  • 物理遮挡摄像头:简单的贴纸就能防止远程激活偷窥。
  • 安装可信安全软件:定期扫描系统文件和后台运行行为。

结语:技术是利器,也是隐忧

技术本是守护公共安全的工具,但若缺乏监管与透明,就可能变成侵犯公民自由的利器。

从这起“警察也遭监听”的事件来看,加拿大在信息时代的隐私保护已进入警戒红线。不仅是政策制定者,每一位普通人也都该意识到:你掌中的那部手机,既是工具,也是战场。

而我们能做的第一步,便是知道这一切,质问这一切,并在必要时,站出来说:“不。”

#加拿大家园论坛

突发! 大规模枪击案 “官二代”狂扫15枪屠杀 学生钻桌底躲子弹 满地鲜血 特朗普紧急发声!

美国再一次陷入枪声与哀悼之间的轮回。这一次,震中是佛罗里达州立大学(FSU),一所拥有超过7万人校园人口的高校。当地时间周四中午,一名年仅20岁的年轻人冲入学生会附近区域,开火长达数分钟,造成至少两人死亡、六人受伤——其中一人伤势危殆。更令人震惊的是,这名枪手竟是当地治安官员的儿子。

枪声响起:从学生会到图书馆,整个校园陷入恐慌

“我以为是施工的声音,‘哒哒哒’,很密集。”大四学生艾玛回忆当时情形时仍显惊恐,“直到有人尖叫‘有枪手!’我们才知道那是真正的子弹。”

枪击发生在中午12点左右,正值学生午餐时间。嫌犯菲尼克斯·伊克纳(Phoenix Ikner)身穿橙色T恤和卡其短裤,混迹在学生人群中,携带母亲的手枪,在校园中央区域至少开了15枪。据称他还一度持有一把散弹枪。

“我们30多个人一起躲在保龄球馆里,有人尖叫,有人哭。”传播系学生瑞安·塞德格伦说。另一位学生称在图书馆听到警报后,“人们像潮水一样奔逃,背包、食物散落一地。”

“他是我们的孩子”:警员之子,暴力阴影中的特权标签

事件发生后不久,警方确认其中一名枪手身份——菲尼克斯·伊克纳,治安官员的儿子。他使用的是母亲注册的枪支,并曾在社交媒体上发布神秘文字:“你是我的战争武器,我用你粉碎国家、摧毁王国。”这一段落出自《圣经》,但语境在此显得尤为刺耳。

“这不是一个‘精神病患者’,也不是‘边缘人’。”一位校内教授愤怒地表示,“他是系统的一部分,而不是系统的受害者。”

枪手的“家庭背景”已迅速引发舆论焦点。一边是愈发严峻的校园安全问题,另一边是“官二代”“警二代”的特权滥用忧虑。社交媒体上,“母亲的枪”“警官之子”等标签迅速登上热搜。

安全系统之殇:封锁、警报、身份口令,却挡不住子弹

根据校方通报,枪击发生第一时间便启动“就地避难”机制,全校师生被要求锁门关窗,等待警方清场。塔拉哈西警察局动用了代号“SEMINOLE”的身份确认口令,并在校园内迅速搜索枪手踪迹。

但有学生指出,尽管学校启动了应急机制,但“从警报响起到警察抵达,已经过去了好几分钟”,足够一名枪手实施杀戮。

“我们总是在亡羊补牢。”一位教育政策专家指出,“当每次事件都需要用‘紧急通报’和‘缅怀仪式’收尾,说明系统本身没有吸取任何教训。”

特朗普与德桑蒂斯发声,但“祈祷”能止血吗?

事件震惊全国。前总统特朗普发布声明称已获悉事态,并“为所有受害者祈祷”。佛罗里达州长罗恩·德桑蒂斯也在社交平台表示“深切悲痛”,并称“州执法部门正在积极应对”。

然而,在民众看来,这类“标准化表态”已经远远无法止住愤怒。

“从小学到大学,我们每年要演练三四次枪击逃生。我孩子不是来读书的,是来演实景逃命游戏的。”一位家长在镜头前情绪激动。

一名大四学生更是在被问及毕业打算时无奈回应:“我准备搬去加拿大,那里至少不用每月悼念一次‘校园血案’。”

枪支政治下的教育困局:教育部被削,校园却要自保?

仅在本周,美国多地已发生三起校园相关枪击案。这起FSU事件尤其引发关注,是该校十年来最严重的一起。早在2014年,该校图书馆也曾发生枪击,三人受伤,枪手被击毙。

讽刺的是,就在几周前,美国国会正辩论削减联邦教育部预算,部分保守派议员甚至建议将其完全取消。“当中央政府逐渐放弃对校园安全的责任,却依旧不肯在控枪议题上迈出一步。”一位前教育政策顾问坦言,“我们正在见证体制性崩塌。”

写在最后:一代人的心理创伤,谁来修复?

“我们这一代人,是在枪声中长大的。”事件发生后,FSU心理健康中心挤满了前来求助的学生。创伤、焦虑、失眠,成为校园生活的日常背景。

而人们也在问:下一个“校园枪击案”会在哪一天、哪一州、哪所学校?我们是否已经开始“默认”这种暴力是“美国日常”?或许,这才是这场悲剧最深层的寒意所在。

#加拿大家园论坛

Missed Tax Benefits! Canadians Losing $3 Billion Annually to the Government, with an Average Loss of $3,000 per Person

As Canada enters the final stretch of the tax season in mid-April, a widely discussed tax report has been released, revealing that hundreds of thousands of Canadians are unknowingly missing out on tax rebates and benefits. On average, each individual loses $3,000 annually, with a total of $3 billion being “given away” to the government each year.

This enormous “lost wealth” is largely attributed to the public’s general lack of understanding of tax policies, the complex design of the tax system, and the exclusion of certain social groups due to language and cultural barriers. While many people still have time to “reclaim” the money that rightfully belongs to them, they must first realize that these benefits are a right, not a favor.

Blind Spot 1: 65% of Canadians Don’t Know Tax Forms Can Be “Amended”

According to a national survey conducted by H&R Block this month, 65% of Canadians were unaware that they could amend their personal income tax returns for the past 10 years to claim missed deductions, tax credits, or benefits that they were entitled to but did not previously claim.

“The most shocking finding in our survey wasn’t what people missed; it was that they didn’t know they could make amendments,” said Yannick Lemay, a senior tax expert at H&R Block. “Many people still believe that once the tax filing deadline has passed, they can no longer make changes, which is completely wrong.”

According to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), individual taxpayers can use the T1 Adjustment Request (T1-ADJ) form to correct tax returns from up to 10 years ago, especially for missed tax credits, medical expenses, education costs, or family care expenditures.

Blind Spot 2: 72% of People “Don’t Bother to Amend” – Is It the Complexity of the System or Information Gap?

The report also highlighted that while some people are aware they can amend their tax returns, 72% of respondents stated they believed that amending old tax returns was “too much trouble,” and therefore chose to forgo potential benefits and rebates.

This has sparked further criticism of the CRA’s service system from both academics and tax professionals.

“It’s not just an issue of ‘not knowing,’ but a lack of trust in the entire tax system,” said Elena Jiang, an associate professor of public policy at UBC. “The government’s intention behind these tax credits was ‘social redistribution,’ but in reality, they have become opportunities that only the ‘information elite’ know how to take advantage of.”

According to Jiang, information gaps, tax burdens, and language and cultural barriers are key factors preventing low-income groups, immigrants, and younger people from claiming these benefits.

“You first have to know that the benefit exists, then know that you qualify, then know how to fill it out, and you also need to know that you can amend it… It’s a system with a very high information threshold,” she said.

Real-World Impact: Losing $3,000 – “This Could Have Helped Me Pay My Credit Card Bill Last Month”

“I was shocked,” said Lily Wang, a full-time mom from Toronto, in an interview. “I always thought the student loan interest credit was just a small number, but I had no idea that I could claim the interest I paid over the past five years, and even get a refund of a few hundred dollars.”

Wang had used H&R Block’s Second Look service at the recommendation of a friend and discovered that she could claim multiple expenses, including after-school psychological counseling and orthodontic treatment for her children, under medical expense tax credits (METC).

“I used to think filing taxes was just filling out software, and maybe I’d get a few hundred dollars back in GST/HST refunds. Now I realize, we’ve been ‘automatically waiving our rights’ this whole time,” she said.

Experts’ Overview: Top 10 Most Commonly Missed Tax Benefits in Canada – How Many Have You Missed?

H&R Block has compiled a list of the top 10 most commonly overlooked tax credits and deductions, many of which can be claimed retroactively through CRA amendments:

BenefitDescriptionAmount Refundable/Claimable
Childcare Expenses CreditUp to $8,000 for children under 7Up to $8,000 per child
Canada Workers Benefit (CWB)Tax credit for low-income workers$1,590 for single, $2,739 for families
Student Loan Interest CreditClaim interest paid on student loans for the past 5 yearsBased on actual interest paid
Medical Expense Tax Credit (METC)Dental, orthodontic, mental health costs, etc.No limit, 15% of eligible expenses
Moving Expenses DeductionMoving 40+ km for work or studyIncludes temporary accommodation, real estate fees, etc.
Home Accessibility Tax Credit (HATC)Modifications for seniors or people with disabilitiesUp to $3,000
Disability Tax Credit (DTC)Applies to conditions like ADHD, diabetes, etc.Up to $9,872, depending on the case
Tuition Tax CreditTransferable or cumulative indefinitelyUp to $5,000 per year transferable
First-Time Homebuyers’ Tax Credit (HBTC)Tax rebate for first-time homebuyersUp to $1,500
Caregiver Credit (CCC)For those caring for elderly or disabled family membersUp to $8,375

It’s important to note that many people mistakenly believe they don’t qualify for credits like the CWB or DTC because they “don’t earn enough.” However, these credits are not limited to low-income individuals.

“The most common misunderstanding we encounter is: ‘I don’t receive government benefits, so these credits don’t apply to me,’” Lemay explained. “In reality, as long as you have a job, children, family members, or loans, you may qualify for these credits.”

Language and Class Barriers: Information Inequality Creates “Financial Inequality”

An elderly immigrant from the Greater Vancouver area shared, “We used to rely on our son’s friend to help us with the tax filing, and no one ever told me that these credits were available.”

In her view, language barriers, lack of professional knowledge, and even a lack of trust in the government system have led many immigrant families to miss out on the support resources that rightfully belong to them.

Data shows that new immigrants and non-native English speakers are significantly more likely to make errors, omissions, or miss out on benefits compared to the general population.

“This isn’t about laziness; it’s that the system doesn’t take them into account,” said Professor Elena Jiang. “A truly fair tax system cannot only benefit the ‘information elite.’”

Still Time to Reclaim Missed Benefits: How to Apply for Retroactive Refunds

The CRA currently allows individuals to apply for retroactive credits or refunds using the following steps:

  1. Log into your CRA account and download/fill out the T1-ADJ form
  2. Specify the years and credits you wish to amend
  3. Attach supporting documents (e.g., receipts, medical bills, loan interest details)
  4. Choose to submit by mail or electronically
  5. Wait for CRA’s processing (typically several weeks to months)

Many tax services (such as H&R Block and TurboTax) also offer “historical review” services to help users reclaim misreported items from previous years.

Conclusion: The Government Won’t Tell You What You’re Entitled To

“You’re not missing out on benefits, you’re missing out on opportunities—the portion of your earnings that should rightfully be yours,” commented one Twitter user.

In the current climate of high inflation, rising living costs, and high interest rates in Canada, every refundable dollar is like “lifesaving water” for household finances.

If we’ve missed out in the past due to ignorance, negligence, or lack of time, it may be time to reassess our relationship with “taxes.” They’re not just cold government forms—they’re maps that hold the potential to unlock your wealth.

And you must learn to find the key yourself.

错过福利抵税!加拿大人每年给政府“白打工”$30亿?人均损失$3000

在加拿大全国税务季进入尾声的4月中旬,一份引发广泛关注的税务调查报告曝光:数以十万计的加拿大人因未申报应得的退税福利,平均每人损失3,000加元,全国总计高达30亿加元“白送”给政府。

这笔巨额“沉没财富”的背后,是民众普遍对报税政策理解不足、税务系统设计复杂,甚至部分社会群体因语言与文化障碍而“被排除在外”的制度现实。眼下,很多人还来得及“追回”这些本就属于自己的钱,但他们首先必须认识到——这是权利,不是恩赐。

【盲区一】65%加拿大人根本不知道:税表可以“回头改”

根据H&R Block于本月发布的全国性调查,有65%的受访加拿大人并不清楚,他们可以修改过去10年的个人所得税申报表,补报漏申、错报或未能主张的抵税额度与福利。

“我们调查中最震惊的发现,不是人们错过了什么,而是他们根本不知道还能改。”H&R Block资深税务专家Yannick Lemay说,“很多人对CRA的理解仍停留在‘报税时间错过了就没了’的认知,这种观念是完全错误的。”

根据加拿大税务局(CRA)规定,个人纳税人可以通过T1 Adjustment Request(T1-ADJ)表格,对过去最多10年的税表提出修正申请,尤其适用于此前漏报的税务抵免项目、医疗支出、教育费用或家庭照护开支等。

【盲区二】72%人“懒得改”——制度设计太繁复还是资讯落差?

报告还指出,尽管部分民众知道税表可修改,但高达72%的受访者表示,他们认为“改旧税表太麻烦”,因此选择放弃申报可能领取的补贴与抵税额。

这引发了学界与税务界对CRA服务体系的进一步质疑。

“这已经不仅仅是‘不懂’的问题,而是对整个税务系统的不信任。”UBC公共政策系副教授Elena Jiang指出,“政府设立这些抵税项目的初衷是‘社会再分配’,但现实中它们成了‘信息精英’才懂得利用的机会。”

在她看来,信息落差、报税负担与语言文化障碍,是造成低收入群体、移民与年轻人错过福利的关键因素。

“你得先知道它存在、再知道你符合资格、再知道怎么填、还得知道你能回头改……这是一个信息门槛极高的系统。”她说。

【现实冲击】$3000白白损失——“这笔钱本可以缓解我上个月的信用卡账单”

“我很震惊。”来自多伦多的全职妈妈Lily Wang接受采访时说,“我一直以为学生贷款利息抵免就是个小数字,没想到我这几年一直在还款,竟然可以回报过去五年的利息,还能退回几百元。”

她是在朋友推荐下使用了H&R Block的Second Look服务,结果发现自己多项支出都可申请抵税,尤其是孩子的课后心理咨询与牙齿矫正支出都可计入医疗费用抵免(METC)。

“我以前觉得报税就是填软件,最多拿几百块GST/HST退税就算完了。现在发现,其实是我们一直在‘自动放弃权利’。”她说。

【专家盘点】10项加拿大人最常错过的抵税福利,你中了几条?

H&R Block根据历年案例整理出最容易被纳税人忽视的十大退税抵免项目,其中多项可以通过CRA回溯申报追补:

项目名称简介可退/抵金额
托儿费用抵免7岁以下子女最高抵$8,000高达$8,000/儿童
加拿大工人福利 (CWB)低收入工作者可退税单身$1,590,家庭$2,739
学生贷款利息抵免可申报近5年已支付利息视实际利息而定
医疗支出抵免 (METC)牙科、正畸、心理健康等无上限,按15%比例抵
搬家费用扣除搬家40km以上为工作或学习含临时住宿、房屋中介费等
家居无障碍改造抵免 (HATC)为长者或残障人士改善住所最多可退$3,000
残障人士税收抵免 (DTC)ADHD、糖尿病等也可能符合可退$9,872,视具体情况
学费抵免可转让或无限期累积最高转让$5,000/年
首次购房者抵税额 (HBTC)新购房者税务抵免可抵$1,500
看护者抵免 (CCC)照顾家中老人或残障人士最高$8,375

值得注意的是,不少人因为“觉得自己不够穷”而放弃申请CWB或DTC等抵免项目,但实际上,这些抵免的资格标准并非仅限最低收入人群。

“我们最常见的误解是:‘我没有拿政府福利,所以这些和我无关。’”Lemay表示,“其实,只要你有工作、有孩子、有家人、有贷款,你就有可能符合抵免条件。”

【语言与阶层壁垒】信息不对等制造“财务不平等”

来自大温地区的一位移民家庭长者告诉记者:“我们以前报税全靠儿子朋友帮忙点几个按钮,没人跟我讲这些抵税能补。”

在她看来,语言障碍、缺乏专业知识、甚至对政府系统的信任缺失,都让很多新移民家庭错过了“真正属于他们的支持资源”。

数据显示,新移民与非英语母语者在报税时出现错误、漏报或错失福利的比例显著高于平均水平。

“这不是他们懒,而是系统没有考虑他们。”Elena Jiang教授指出,“一个真正公平的税收系统,不能只让‘信息强者’受益。”

【追溯机会还在】如何申请退回过去10年的错失福利?

CRA目前允许个人通过以下方式申请回溯抵免或退款:

  1. 登录CRA账户,下载/填写 T1-ADJ表格
  2. 指明要补报的年份与具体抵免项目
  3. 附上支持文件(如收据、医疗账单、贷款利息明细等)
  4. 选择邮寄或电子提交
  5. 等待CRA审理(通常需数周至数月)

不少税务服务机构(如H&R Block、TurboTax)也推出了类似“历史审查”功能,帮助用户追溯过往错报部分。

【结语】这些钱,政府不会主动告诉你你能拿

“你错过的不是福利,是机会,是你劳动所得中本应属于你的那部分。”一位网友在推特上这样评论道。

在加拿大通胀高企、生活成本不断上升、利率居高不下的当下,每一笔可退税的金额都是家庭财务状况中的“救命水”

如果说过去我们因为无知、疏忽、时间不够而错过,那从今天开始,也许是时候重新审视我们与“税务”之间的关系了。它不是冷冰冰的政府文件,它是一张藏着你财富可能性的地图。

而你,必须学会自己去找那把钥匙。

#加拿大家园论坛

“I’m Not Trudeau” — Liberals Seek to Shed a Decade of Incumbency Baggage

OTTAWA — Mark Carney knew the comparison was inevitable. On stage at Canada’s first televised federal leaders’ debate, the former central banker-turned-political leader faced a direct attack from Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre: “Mr. Carney, your party has been in power for 10 years. You are like Trudeau. We need change.”

Carney responded swiftly, “You’re not Trudeau. I’m not Trudeau.” It was a calculated departure from the legacy of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, under whom Carney once served as an informal economic adviser. Now, as leader of a Liberal Party seeking a fourth consecutive term, Carney must convince voters he represents continuity in experience—but a break from leadership fatigue.

A Technocrat’s Gamble

Mr. Carney, 59, comes to the campaign with a résumé few in Canadian politics can match. A former governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, he has also served as UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance. His entry into politics was long anticipated, but his timing presents both opportunities and constraints.

Facing a resurgent Conservative Party under Mr. Poilievre, who has capitalized on cost-of-living pressures and a growing skepticism toward federal institutions, Mr. Carney’s brand of calm technocratic leadership is being positioned as a stabilizing force amid rising global volatility.

But the perception that he is a policy architect behind the Liberal Party’s record—marked by ballooning deficits, high immigration targets, and an underperforming housing market—poses political risks.

“Carney represents a very different tone and policy orientation than Trudeau,” said Jennifer Welsh, a political science professor at McGill University. “But it’s not yet clear that voters will distinguish him from the broader Liberal record.”

A Decade in Power, and the Weight That Comes With It

Since 2015, the Liberal Party has overseen expansive social spending programs, a carbon pricing regime, and a foreign policy often aligned with multilateralism. The government also weathered a global pandemic and subsequent inflationary surge, both of which have tested its credibility with middle-class voters.

Public support has eroded in recent years. According to an Ipsos poll conducted earlier this month, 47% of respondents said it is time for a new party to govern, while only 28% expressed confidence in the Liberals’ ability to manage the economy.

In response, Mr. Carney has unveiled a platform focusing on what he calls “pragmatic growth”—a mix of green energy investment, targeted tax reform, and aggressive housing supply measures aimed at restoring affordability.

“I am not running on the past. I am running to build a resilient future,” Carney said during the debate, seeking to underline his economic credentials without defending every decision of the Trudeau years.

Conservatives Lean Into “Change” Message

Mr. Poilievre, for his part, has leaned heavily into the “time for change” narrative. In the debate, he attacked the Liberals on inflation, immigration policy, and public debt—topics where Carney’s prior roles make him both highly knowledgeable and politically vulnerable.

“Poilievre is betting that Carney can’t escape the Liberal shadow,” said Darrell Bricker, CEO of Ipsos Public Affairs. “Whether that’s fair or not is beside the point. What matters is whether voters believe in the distinction.”

Still, Mr. Carney’s “I’m not Trudeau” remark may prove pivotal. For some Liberal voters wary of a fourth Trudeau term but hesitant to back Poilievre, it offers a psychological off-ramp—an option to stay the course, with new leadership.

Markets Watching Closely

Bay Street and international investors are closely monitoring Carney’s performance. His global economic reputation lends credibility, especially in the eyes of institutional players concerned with Canada’s fiscal discipline and regulatory stability. But political capital, like market confidence, is easy to lose and hard to earn back.

The next leaders’ debate is expected in two weeks, where economic policy is again set to dominate. Until then, Mr. Carney’s balancing act—between insider and reformer, continuity and change—remains the defining tension of a high-stakes campaign.

#加拿大家园论坛